er. the klan, if my recollection serves correct, killed dozens if not hundreds of people. they certainly weren't infamous for lynching black families' cars. what i hear you saying is that a crime that causes solely economic damage that is aimed at forwarding a political agenda should be construed as terrorism. by this thinking acts of civil disobedience, such as blockading a logging road, would also be classified as acts of terror.
sounds like judge aiken is taking us down that slippery slope.
er. the klan, if my recollection serves correct, killed dozens if not hundreds of people. they certainly weren't infamous for lynching black families' cars. what i hear you saying is that a crime that causes solely economic damage that is aimed at forwarding a political agenda should be construed as terrorism. by this thinking acts of civil disobedience, such as blockading a logging road, would also be classified as acts of terror.
ReplyDeletesounds like judge aiken is taking us down that slippery slope.