I hope you will be using your platform at Slate to respond to the article Adam Liptak has just published in the NYT attacking the exclusionary rule. It is frightening to think that many lay people may read that article and believe the inaccuracies he bases so much of his argument on(and there should be no doubt that Liptak is advancing a position) when we already have a SCOTUS so hostile to the 4th Amendment.
-Lee J. Stonum Deputy Alternate Defender, Orange County, CA
David,
ReplyDeleteI hope you will be using your platform at Slate to respond to the article Adam Liptak has just published in the NYT attacking the exclusionary rule. It is frightening to think that many lay people may read that article and believe the inaccuracies he bases so much of his argument on(and there should be no doubt that Liptak is advancing a position) when we already have a SCOTUS so hostile to the 4th Amendment.
-Lee J. Stonum
Deputy Alternate Defender,
Orange County, CA
Wow, looks good! I'll be setting my Tivo. And I feel like I know exactly which judge Jane Kaczmarek is supposed to be...
ReplyDeleteI can't get over Mark Paul Gosseler's HAIR! It's distracting.
ReplyDeleteYeah I'm shallow.