This from Kentucky...
"The success that some people have had in terms of challenging their convictions because of DNA evidence is sort of being turned against the general population of people who are seeking habeas review" based on other grounds, Abramson said.
Proving innocence "seems to be the relatively narrow channel that's going to be left if this act passes," he said.
Hello? Didn't I go on at great length about the danger of shifting the paradigm from reasonable doubt to demonstrable innocence?
my controversial book about a day in my life as Public Defender in the South Bronx is finally available for Kindle and Ipad.
1 comment:
That was a great article. I remember reading it when it was first published. I want to read the other one the article mentioned about defending someone you know is guilty.
I really enjoy reading your blog.
Post a Comment